Skip to main content

Are introverts and extroverts different?

My mother has often worried about the way I seem to enjoy my time. My definition of a good time is at home by myself doing whatever I want with some scrumptious food at my disposal. My mother is a creature from a different universe. She loves the world outside, she adores meeting new people, socialising and playing host whenever she possibly can. I cannot tell you the number of times this personality disparity has made me question the biological basis of our relation, but that is a topic for another time.  
Introverts vs extroverts

If it is not obvious to you by now, my mother and I are not exactly on the same spectrum of the personality scale, while she is a shiny, beamy extrovert who gets energised by the external world, I am the warm, silent introvert who passionately clings to quality me-time whenever I possibly can. While you wouldn’t want to get caught on one of our quality mother daughter time, this got me thinking about how deep this difference between extroverts and introverts really is.

Its not just skin deep/ there’s more to it than meets the eye

personalities not just skin deepWhile many of us just think about personalities as this external façade that is ever changing, studies show us that it is far from that. Hans Eysenck, extraordinary psychologist was first to bring this to every ones attention in a paper published in 1967. Research shows us that personalities are hard wired down to the physiological and chemical level in the brain, not necessarily unchanging, but rather shaped by our experiences in general (If you want to read more on this visit the Dr Colin DeYoung’ lab). For example it has been observed that people who are more extraverted have a bigger medial orbitofrontal cortex  which is involved in decision making and expectation (or reward and punishment), as compared to the rest of the population.

Another major difference is the way our brains react to neurotransmitters. Turns out each brain type (introverted or extroverted) has its special cocktail to turn on the mojo (with mojo – I mean reward). An extroverted brain relies heavily on Dopamine for stimulation. Dopamine is responsible for reward motivated behaviour as well as increased body temperature, increased heart rate, increased movement; in short Dopamine gives you a rush.

On the other hand an introverted brain relies heavily on acetylcholine – a neurotransmitter, known for its more relaxing effects like digestion, lowering blood pressure, lowering heart rate, in short if you love lounging at home with a nice book or a movie series, you are basking in the warmth of acetylcholine.

While different neurotransmitters may be responsible for the feeling satisfaction for different individuals it is interesting to note that introverts and extroverts seem to tap into same systems very differently. One such example is the Reticular formation - part of the brain stem also referred to as the primitive brain. The Reticular Formation is involved in vital functions like sleep, pain, fatigue, motivation, alertness and consciousness among others. This region has also been one of the key regions concerning behaviour. In fact antipsychotic drugs seem to have maximum effect in the reticular formation. This region is also being studied in context to introversion and extroversion (Biological Basis of Personality Eysenck, 1967). Turns out that introverted individuals possess an easily stimulated reticular formation, while and extroverted brain has a less stimulated reticular formation. The introverted mind is hence less likely to seek external stimulation, while an extroverted mind is more likely to crave external stimulation.

But this debate dint start now, it is centuries old

So there we have it, introversion and extroversions are not just external personality but deep rooted traits that have physiological signs, but what about the genetics? One of the more fascinating studies that came up with during my research was by Dr Glen Geher and his team at the New Paltz Neanderthal Project that is looking at the personality traits of Neanderthals.

Neanderthals vs humans
Although Neanderthals are considered a different sub species from Homo Sapiens, they were anything but savages, in fact they were very much like the way we are today (except for the clothes and the tech and a bunch of other things perhaps). Turns out that Neanderthals were quite artistic, had bigger craniums and had more than just meat on the menu. Homo sapiens are social animals- in that I mean we were able to form and exist in large groups extending way beyond our kin. The Neanderthals dint do that, they lived in a small group (extending sometimes to the max of 30 individuals) of kin.

We share about 99.7% of our genome with Neanderthal which makes us very close. Dr Geher and his team have worked out a way to find out the personalities of Neanderthal by comparing our DNA with those of the Neanderthal’s DNA.

Volunteers who share their genetic information are asked to complete a 45 minute survey. Your DNA sequence then goes through a DNA overlap report, which gives you a range of shared DNA - from 1 to 4%, which can also go to 10%. This data is then analysed with the survey. Turns out the more you share with the Neanderthals the more likely you have the following traits –

Introversion, less emotionally stable, lower religiosity, not too enthusiastic about fiction, receive less emotional support from others.

And when there is a lesser overlap, or similarity you are likely to be -

More extroverted, have a wider social network, emotionally more stable, among others.

In short, the more you share with Neanderthal the more you are inclined to an introverted personality, while the lesser Neanderthal – the more social and extroverted.

There is so much that we need to know about how we tick and how it manifests on the surface. Personalities are not skin deep and nor are they set for life, which is also inter

esting. The more I dig up on the matter the more I have realised that I have my mother to thank for a lot of my more quieter inclinations, no matter how very different we may be from each other.  



Popular posts from this blog

Do free energy magnetic motors really work?

The internet is rife with websites that promote generators that are capable of providing electricity without using any fuel. Built largely with magnets, these 'free energy generators' promise to cut your electricity bills and provide a much greener alternative to the electricity that is largely generated out of fossil fuels. Elaborate videos that give you estimates of how much money you can save without revealing any details of how to go about it, manage to keep the audience hooked on for a while, but $40 price tag, the loads of freebies and the instant $10 discount for not leaving the page, make the product and its seller highly suspicious. So, we decided to find out if these free energy magnetic motors really work?

The Principle

The magnetic motor works on the simple principle that we all already know, 'Like poles repel each other while opposite poles attract each other'. By arranging the magnets in a fashion where only like poles face each other, one can simply set t…

Why Sci-Hub’s story is so crucial to science?

On the 28th of October 2015, Judge Robert Sweet in his ruling at the New York district court declared that the website be blocked with immediate effect and managed to stop hundreds and thousands of researchers and science enthusiasts from accessing the holy grail of today’s science, the research paper.
What should be a simple means to communicate to the world one’s research findings, has become a currency of some sort. A ticket to a researcher’s professional success, a magnet for an investigator to attract funding for his lab and the elusive piece of the puzzle that the publishing group can hold you ransom for, until you cough up some good cash ($30 or above for a single article and thousands of dollars for a bundled annual subscription)
What Judge Sweet termed as a “disservice (to) public interest”, is actually a small website that allows you access to scientific research, old and new, and for free. Sci- Hub. Org, started in 2011, as a trusted place to access research …

Generating electricity from flapping tree leaves

As kids, you might have spent many afternoons, under a huge tree, enjoying its shade. In a tropical country like India, trees are a welcome sight in the month of May, when the sun is blazing in the sky and the shade offered by them is a hundred thousand times better than artificial cooling of the air conditioning units. But never in our dream would we have thought that the rustling of the tiny leaves of the trees could one day make electricity for us.Because that requires a Hendersonian moment! (just in a bit)

This brilliant idea has come from the lab of a biophysicist at Iowa State University, Dr. Michael McCloskey, whose work at the University largely involves the study of membrane transport in algae and adult born neurons but also has a background in plant sciences. It was his colleague in the department of genetics, Dr. Eric Henderson who first came up with this plan of harvesting energy from leaves as he wondered how much kinetic energy was being generated when winds blow across l…

5 things driverless cars will do to change our future?

The race for building the world’s first commercially available driverless car is on. Google seems to be leading the pack and in its own charismatic style has been very open about it. Elon Musk’s Tesla is considered the second best with their cars having almost automated the driving process. Tech favourites, Apple also seem to be in the race but everything is under wraps, as of now, and there is not even a hint of what Apple is planning to make, the car, the software or simply make the car accessible with your Apple ID.
Once part of science fiction, driverless cars will soon be a part of our lives and with major automobile manufacturers such as General Motors, Toyota, Ford investing in the technology, prototypes of driverless cars will soon be seen on the roads. Before we get there, a quick review.
The Driverless car
The concept of automated driving has been around for close to a century but progress was slow due to unavailability of technology. For a car to be autonomous, it needs to kno…

Solar cells that work in rain

In case you have read my last month’s guest post about harvesting solar energy in rust, you would be delighted to know that there has been yet another breakthrough in our attempt to harness solar energy.  For many years, solar energy has been targeted for being unavailable at night and during rains. The problem of utilizing solar energy at night can be resolved with the help of metal oxide cells as elaborated in my above post (do read it, if you have not done so already). And now researchers at the Ocean University in China have addressed the second problem and developed solar cells that can actually use rain drops to generate electricity.
Published in the German journal Angewandte Chemie, the paper titled, A Solar Cell Triggered by Sun and Rain, opens a new realm of possibilities when harnessing solar energy. Coating the solar cell with a thin film of graphene allows the cell to function even when it is raining. Graphene is nothing but reduced form of graphite that consists of a hone…